Nebraska isn’t the only state eyeing sports betting as a revenue solution. It’s just the latest.
A new report suggests legalizing online sports betting in Nebraska could generate nearly $87 million over five years, with much of it earmarked for property tax relief. But zoom out, and the bigger story becomes clear:
States across the country are increasingly turning to sports betting to fund budgets, without raising traditional taxes.
But it’s changing how tax systems are built.
The Nebraska proposal is straightforward:
Legalize online sports betting
Capture revenue already leaving the state
Use a large portion of it to offset property taxes
Right now, Nebraska only allows in-person betting. But residents are already crossing state lines — or attempting to place bets online — meaning the demand (and money) is already there.
The state just isn’t collecting it, which is the argument being made in dozens of other states.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the federal ban on sports betting in 2018, states have moved quickly.
Today, the majority of states allow some form of sports betting, and many have expanded into online platforms, where most of the revenue actually comes from.
The result:
Billions in new tax revenue
A rapidly growing industry
A new category of “behavior-based” taxation
States like New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania now generate hundreds of millions annually from sports betting taxes alone.
Crucially, online betting, not in-person, drives the vast majority of that revenue.
The appeal is obvious.
Sports betting offers something most tax policies don’t:
Voluntary participation
A broad user base
Fast revenue growth
Political palatability
In other words, it doesn’t feel like a traditional tax increase
That makes it easier to pass, especially when paired with promises like property tax relief, education funding, or infrastructure support.
The big numbers can be misleading.
Nebraska’s projected $87 million over five years sounds significant until you break it down: It equates to about $17 million per year
For a state budget, that’s helpful, but not transformative. And, this isn’t unique to Nebraska.
Across the country, sports betting revenue tends to:
Grow quickly at first
Level off over time
Depend heavily on market size and competition
States with smaller populations or strong competition from neighboring states often see more modest returns.
This is where the trend gets more interesting.
States aren’t just adding sports betting revenue.
They’re using it to offset other taxes.
In Nebraska’s case:
A large portion of revenue would go toward property tax relief
In other states:
Funds are directed toward education
Infrastructure
General budget support
This reflects a broader shift:
Tax systems are becoming more dependent on targeted, activity-based revenue instead of broad-based increases.
Of course, the expansion of sports betting isn’t without debate.
Opponents point to:
Increased problem gambling
Financial strain on vulnerable populations
Long-term social costs
Supporters argue:
The activity already exists (often across state lines or illegally)
Regulation makes it safer
It allows states to capture revenue that would otherwise be lost
This tension is playing out in nearly every state considering expansion.
Even if you never place a bet, this trend matters.
Because it reflects how governments are thinking about taxes:
Shift away from broad increases
Target specific behaviors
Capture revenue from optional activities
Use that revenue to offset more visible taxes
In practical terms, that could mean:
Slightly lower property taxes
More reliance on “sin taxes”
Greater variability in state revenue streams
Nebraska’s proposal isn’t just about sports betting. It’s about how states are rethinking revenue.
From coast to coast, governments are looking for ways to fund budgets without raising traditional taxes — and sports betting has become one of the most popular tools. The question isn’t whether more states will adopt it.
It’s how much they’ll come to depend on it.
Sign up for our newsletters and get our articles delivered right to your inbox.
Check the background of your financial professional on FINRA's BrokerCheck
Avantax affiliated Financial Professionals may only conduct business with residents of the states for which they are properly registered. Please note that not all of the investments and services mentioned are available in every state. Securities offered through Avantax Investment Services℠, Member FINRA, SIPC, Investment Advisory services offered through Avantax Advisory ServicesSM, Insurance services offered through an Avantax affiliated insurance agency. 3200 Olympus Blvd., Suite 100, Dallas, TX 75019. 972-870-6000.
The Avantax family of companies exclusively provide financial products and services through its financial representatives. Although Avantax Wealth Management® does not provide or supervise tax or accounting services, Avantax representatives may offer these services through their independent outside business. Content, links, and some material within this website may have been created by a third party for use by an Avantax affiliated representative. This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not represent the views and opinions of Avantax Wealth Management® or its subsidiaries. Avantax Wealth Management® is not responsible for and does not control, adopt, or endorse any content contained on any third party website.
This information is not intended as tax or legal advice. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation.
The information being provided is strictly as a courtesy. When you link to any of the web sites provided here, you are leaving this web site. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these web sites. Nor is the company liable for any direct or indirect technical or system issues or any consequences.
For Important Information and Form CRS please visit https://www.avantax.com/disclosures.