Learning Center

What Led to Congress Extending the Paycheck Protection Program?

The economic uncertainty created in the outset of the Coronavirus pandemic was unprecedented, to say the least. This is a big part of the reason why, soon after the spread began, Congress took steps that were equally drastic - they passed the Paycheck Protection Program, otherwise known as the PPP, in an attempt to help as many small businesses as possible stay afloat.

The PPP was first included in the $2 trillion Coronavirus relief package, the CARES Act, that was itself passed by Congress in March. According to one recent report, more than 4.8 million small businesses have already received in excess of $520 billion from the program up to this point.

At its core, the PPP is exactly what it sounds like: a specific type of loan program designed to provide a direct and tangible incentive for small businesses to keep as many workers on their payroll as possible, even during a period when many of them may not be allowed to open to the general public due to lock downs.

As of July 2020, two full rounds of the Paycheck Protection Program have been passed. The first, initial wave was depleted extremely quickly – thus leading to a second wave that still has approximately $130 billion in unspent funds remaining at the time of this extension passing.

But with so much money still left to be distributed, one has to wonder – why did Congress have to extend the PPP in the first place? What circumstances led to that event, and where does the program stand today?

PPP and the Shape of Things to Come

The current five-week extension of the Paycheck Protection Program was approved by both chambers of Congress at the end of June 2020. With it, the application window for the program reopened and would remain accessible to SMBs until August 8. As was true with the first round, the loans are intended to help cover payroll and other select costs.

Under the terms and conditions of the loan, recipients can see their loan balances forgiven so long as the funds were used for "eligible expenses," and so long as other criteria was met. The total amount of the loan forgiveness may be reduced, however, based on the percentage of eligible costs attributed to non-payroll-related matters. A decrease in the number of employees a business was keeping on, decreases in salaries and wages, or other factors could also reduce loan forgiveness amounts. But again - what you're dealing with is a situation where the first round of loans was depleted incredibly quickly, while the second still has a significant sum of money for eligible applicants just waiting to be taken advantage of. Why, then, is there such a significant discrepancy in activity?

Part of the reason why the second wave of the Paycheck Protection Program seemed to have lower demand than the first is because by the time of its passing, it became clear that applying for loan forgiveness wouldn't be quite as simple as a lot of small business owners had hoped. The Small Business Administration and the Treasury Department were both late in releasing specific guidance and rules about the actual loan forgiveness process - leading to business owners who were counting on that money being forgiven that may not be so lucky any longer.

Therefore, it's been reported that a lot of small businesses are either considering returning the money or holding out on the program entirely because they're not actually sure whether or not they're going to be required to repay that debt.

Also complicating things is the idea of loan duplicates - meaning loans that were essentially identical that were handed out to the same business or entity. The Small Business Administration was supposed to have a system in place to accurately determine whether or not an applicant had already received a loan and if they had, their second loan would be denied.

The issue is that because of the chaos created in those early days of the program, many borrowers submitted multiple applications through different lenders. Sometimes, different identification information was even used - thus making it difficult to track these potentially duplicate loans. All told, it's been said that the agency may have inadvertently approved more than 1,000 duplicate Paycheck Protection Program loans equaling as much as $100 million – a situation that will also need to be addressed to restore people's faith in the program moving forward.

For many small businesses out there, the Paycheck Protection Program literally couldn't have come along at a better moment. With so many organizations legally unable to open to the public – thus severely limiting the amount of potential revenue they could bring in – they needed something, ANYTHING, to get by.

By all accounts, the PPP has done that for many people. But with rules and regulations governing forgiveness that seem to be constantly in flux, coupled with the uncertainty of when the pandemic is going to end in the first place, something of a malaise has set in regarding this second and most recent extension.

Small businesses make up the backbone of the United States economy. Make absolutely no mistake about it: they need all the help they can get right now. It's becoming clearer and clearer, however, that the Paycheck Protection Program as it exists today may not be enough to do it. This, coupled with serious questions as to who is getting the majority of these funds, means that this is one situation people are going to be paying close attention to moving forward.


Share this article...

NEVER MISS A STORY.

Sign up for our newsletters and get our articles delivered right to your inbox.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

Social Media

Rose Tax & Financial

8 Pinon Ave
Cedar Crest, New Mexico 87008
Mon - Fri: 10:00am to 6:00pm
Sat: 10:00am to 2:00pm

Check the background of your financial professional on FINRA's BrokerCheck
Avantax affiliated Financial Professionals may only conduct business with residents of the states for which they are properly registered. Please note that not all of the investments and services mentioned are available in every state. Securities offered through Avantax Investment Services℠, Member FINRA, SIPC, Investment Advisory services offered through Avantax Advisory ServicesSM, Insurance services offered through an Avantax affiliated insurance agency. 3200 Olympus Blvd., Suite 100, Dallas, TX 75019. 972-870-6000.
The Avantax family of companies exclusively provide financial products and services through its financial representatives. Although Avantax Wealth Management® does not provide or supervise tax or accounting services, Avantax representatives may offer these services through their independent outside business. Content, links, and some material within this website may have been created by a third party for use by an Avantax affiliated representative. This content is for educational and informational purposes only and does not represent the views and opinions of Avantax Wealth Management® or its subsidiaries. Avantax Wealth Management® is not responsible for and does not control, adopt, or endorse any content contained on any third party website.
This information is not intended as tax or legal advice. Please consult legal or tax professionals for specific information regarding your individual situation.
The information being provided is strictly as a courtesy. When you link to any of the web sites provided here, you are leaving this web site. We make no representation as to the completeness or accuracy of information provided at these web sites. Nor is the company liable for any direct or indirect technical or system issues or any consequences.
For Important Information and Form CRS please visit https://www.avantax.com/disclosures.

FAQs Frequently Asked Questions
Type your message here.
Please fill out the form and our team will get back to you shortly The form was sent successfully